Your biggest citation gaps
The prompts you are most absent on, ranked by how many sampled answers came back without you.
What it is
A stakes-ranked queue built from your measured presence map. The map shows every prompt-and-engine cell; this answers the next question, which absence to work first, by counting the sampled answers that did not cite you.
When to use it
After a measured Answer Share run, when you have more gaps than time and need to pick the one worth the effort.
Step by step
- 1Run Answer Share so there are sampled answers to count.
- 2Open Analyze and find Biggest citation gaps.
- 3Read the top rows. Each names the prompt, how many of its sampled answers missed you, the miss rate, and which engines never cited you.
- 4Work the top gap through Optimize, then re-measure and watch the miss count move.
What you will see
A numbered list of up to six prompts, each showing how many of its sampled answers missed you, the engines you were never cited on, and the engines that do cite you. When more prompts have a measured gap than fit the list, the remaining count is stated instead of hidden.
Measured, never manufactured
The ranking is built only from what was measured: sampled answers that came back without you. A prompt sampled twenty times and never citing you outranks one sampled twice, because twenty is stronger evidence that the gap is real. The ideal weight would also carry a rival term, that a competitor is cited here and you are not, and it is deliberately left out: competitor classification has no writer in production today, so that weight would be read from an empty table and would be a number we invented. It multiplies in when the data genuinely exists, and not before. And if every prompt we sampled cited you on every engine, the panel says so, because no gaps is a real measured result rather than an empty state.
Related guides
Next
The single biggest gapOne line at the top of your report naming the largest measured hole and the highest-impact next move.